CIE IAL · Physics · 2025 October/November

9702/52 October/November 2025

This Physics 9702 Paper 5 (Planning & Analysis) paper contains 2 questions worth 30 marks. The profile below reports five mark-weighted difficulty and complexity measures, and every question row repeats them. Full question text and the mark scheme require Pro access.

CIE IAL 9702 P5 2 questions 30 marks Pro paper

Core finding

9702/52 October/November 2025 is a past paper for CIE IAL Physics 9702 Paper 5 (Planning & Analysis), with 2 questions worth 30 marks. Its mark-weighted Difficulty Measure is 0.56 on a 0.20–0.75 scale, with a Difficulty Deviation of 0.20 and a mark split of 10.0% Easy, 30.0% Medium and 60.0% Hard. Algebraic complexity averages 0.38; text density and modelling average 0.53. All five measures use 9 part-level tags, not candidate results. Every question row below repeats them and opens the Interactive Practice Hub for that question.

Difficulty & complexity profile

All five measures are mark-weighted and calculated from 9 parts carrying 30 part marks. Difficulty tags cover 9 parts, algebraic tags 9 and text-density tags 9. Tags are internal metadata, not official exam-board ratings.

Difficulty Measure 0.56 0.20–0.75 · nearer Medium
Difficulty Deviation 0.20 0 = uniform; higher = more mixed
Difficulty Ratio 10.0 / 30.0 / 60.0 % Easy / Medium / Hard
Algebraic Complexity Measure 0.38 0.20–0.75 · nearer Medium
Text Density and Modelling Measure 0.53 0.20–0.75 · nearer Medium

Scale: Easy 0.20 · Medium 0.45 · Hard 0.75, and Low 0.20 · Medium 0.45 · High 0.75 for the two complexity measures. How each band is defined and how the values are calculated →

Definitions and calculation

MeasurePaper valueFormula
Difficulty Measure 0.56 Σ(di × wi) / Σwi, with d = 0.20 / 0.45 / 0.75
Difficulty Deviation 0.20 √(Σwi(di − μ)2 / Σwi)
Difficulty Ratio 10.0% Easy / 30.0% Medium / 60.0% Hard marks in band / all tagged marks
Algebraic Complexity Measure 0.38 Σ(ci × marksi) / Σmarksi, with c = 0.20 / 0.45 / 0.75
Text Density and Modelling Measure 0.53 Σ(ti × marksi) / Σmarksi, with t = 0.20 / 0.45 / 0.75

wi equals the part marks, except for a Hard part worth 4 or more marks, where wi = marks0.75 to offset the accessible starter steps inside long structured questions.

Question list

Each measure is recalculated from the parts of that question and uses the same weights as the paper profile.

QuestionTopicMarksDifficulty MeasureAlgebraic Complexity MeasureText Density and Modelling MeasurePractice
Q1
FRQ
Planning - Defining the problem 15 0.75Hard 0.45Medium 0.75High Go to Practice Hub
Q2
FRQ
Analysis, conclusions and evaluation - Data analysis 15 0.46Medium 0.30Low 0.32Low Go to Practice Hub

Full questions and mark scheme

This paper is from 2025. Question text, options and the mark scheme are available with Pro access. The metadata above is public so you can still plan revision by topic and difficulty.

Open this paper

Paper FAQ

How are the difficulty and complexity measures calculated?
Each part is weighted by its official marks. Difficulty uses Easy 0.20, Medium 0.45 and Hard 0.75; algebraic complexity and text density and modelling use Low 0.20, Medium 0.45 and High 0.75. A Hard part worth 4 or more marks is down-weighted to marks^0.75, so the accessible starter steps inside a long structured question do not inflate the difficulty result. This paper's Difficulty Measure is 0.56 from 9 parts.
What does the Difficulty Deviation show?
It is the mark-weighted standard deviation of the part difficulty values around the paper mean. A value of 0 would mean every tagged part has the same difficulty; this paper's deviation is 0.20, so its parts are more mixed than a single-level paper.
Is the Difficulty Ratio based on question counts or marks?
It is based on official marks, not question counts. This paper's shares are 10.0% Easy, 30.0% Medium and 60.0% Hard; the three shares sum to 100% before rounding.
Are these official difficulty ratings?
No. They are derived from the platform's part-level difficulty and static-question-profile tags. They are not exam-board grade boundaries and are not calculated from candidate outcomes. Use them to compare the demand profile of papers, not to predict a grade.
Why does each question row show its own measures?
Each row recalculates the same mark-weighted formula from that question's parts. A single-part MCQ therefore shows the tag value directly, while a multi-part structured question blends the tags of its parts using the same Hard-part decay as the paper profile.